Marc Hassenzahl
ABSTRACT
User Experience (UX) is not just "old wine in new bottles". It is a truly extended and distinct perspective on the quality of interactive technology: away from products and problems to humans and the drivers of positive experience. This paper will present my particular perspective on UX and will discuss its implications for the field of Human-Computer Interaction.
- Bevan, N. UX, usability and ISO standards. Now let's do it in practice: User experience evaluation methods in product development. Proceedings of the workshop on CHI 2008 {On-line}. Available: www.cs.tut.fi/ihte/CHI08_workshop/papers/Bevan_UXEM_CHI08_06April08.pdf, 2008 Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Blythe, M. & Hassenzahl, M. The semantics of fun: Differentiating enjoyable experiences. In M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003, pp. 91--100. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boehner, K., DePaula, R., Dourish, P., & Sengers, P. How emotion is made and measured. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 2007, 275--291. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.Google Scholar
- Forlizzi, J. & Battarbee, K. Understanding experience in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Designing interactive systems (DIS 04): processes, practices, methods, and techniques. New York: ACM, 2005, pp. 261--268. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M. The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product. In M. Blythe, C. Overbeeke, A. F. Monk, & P. C. Wright (Eds.), Funology: From Usability to Enjoy-ment. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003, pp. 31--42. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hassenzahl, M. & Tractinsky, N. User Experience - a research agenda {Editorial}. Behavior & Information Technology, 25, 2006, 91--97.Google Scholar
- Hassenzahl, M. & Ullrich, D. To do or not to do: Differences in user experience and retrospective judgments depending on the presence or absence of instrumental goals. Interacting with Computers, 19, 2007, 429--437. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Isen, A. M. Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1984, pp. 179--236Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic quality. New York: Sage, 1999, pp. 3--25Google Scholar
- Kaye, J., Levitt, M. K., Nevins, J., Golden, J., & Schmidt, V. Communicating intimacy one bit at a time. In Proceedings of the CHI 05 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Extended abstracts. New York: ACM, 2005, pp. 1529--1532. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C.-W., & Tausch, A. Untersuchungen mit einer deutschen Version der "Positive and Negative Affect Schedule" (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42, 1996, 139--156.Google Scholar
- Leong, T., Howard, S., & Vetere, F. Choice: abid-cating or exercising? In Proceedings of the CHI 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing. New York: ACM Press, 2008, pp. 715--724 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rokeach, M. The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1973.Google Scholar
- Russell, J. A. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 2003, 145--172.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 2000, 68--78.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sheldon, K. M., Elliot, A. J., Kim, Y., & Kasser, T. What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 2001, 325--339.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stewart, T. Usability or user experience - what's the difference? System concepts {On-line}. Avail-able: http://www.system-con-cepts.com/articles/usability%20&%20hci/usability%20or%20user%20experience%20%11%20what's%20the%20difference?/, 2008Google Scholar
- Watson, D. & Tellegen, A. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 1985, 219--235.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wright, P. C. & Blythe, M. User experience research as an inter-discipline: Towards a UX Manifesto. In E. Law, A. Vermeeren, M. Hassenzahl, & M. Blythe (Eds.), Towards a UX Manifesto - Proceedings of a cost294-affiliated workshop on BHCI 2007, 2007, pp. 65--70.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality
Recommendations
Cross-platform service user experience: a field study and an initial framework
MobileHCI '10: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Human computer interaction with mobile devices and servicesMany web-based services utilize both desktop and mobile terminals in delivering content and functionality to their users. In terms of user experience (UX), the overall chain of interactions, including mobile and non-mobile settings, becomes a central ...
User Experience Evaluation by ERM: Experience Recollection Method
Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Human IssuesAbstractEvaluation of user experience (UX) is the key for improving the quality of artifact that people use in their everyday life and thus improve their quality of life. Two types of evaluation methods can be classified, i.e. the real-time method (e.g. ...
User experience: does it matter in complex systems?
This paper explores the concept of user experience (UX) within complex systems in the domain of nuclear power production. The specific context is the development of main control room solutions. As UX has become a prevalent concept in human---computer ...
Comments